IMPORTANT NOTICE: This site is scheduled for closure in September 2016.
If you have any comments about the closure, please post them to the newsgroup.
See this page for information about the newsgroup and how to post to it.

"could of"

by Mark Israel
     [This is a fast-access FAQ excerpt.]
We get frequent complaints about the occurrence of "of" in
unedited prose where the meaning is "have".  "Have" contracts to
"'ve", so "could've", "might've", "must've", "should've",
"would've", etc. (and their negatives, "couldn't've", etc.), should
be so spelled.  People have testified that it's got beyond a
spelling mistake:  they've heard "would of" spoken with a clear
pause between the words.
   WDEU says:  "The OED Supplement dates the naive (or ignorant) use
of of back to 1837.  [...Y]ou had better avoid it in your own
writing. [...]  Bernstein 1977 allows that a schoolchild cannot be
blamed for could of -- once."